“Instead, we are reminded that that it is our responsibility to educate the public about the dangers of this proposed amendment.” “We had hoped to see the court require clear and unconcealed ballot amendment language,” she said in a statement. “Even if we accept relators’ argument that abortion is a ‘unique’ act that is ‘inherently different’ from other reproductive decisions, the decision to obtain an abortion is still a reproductive decision,” the majority said.Ĭincinnati Right to Life President Rachel Citak expressed disappointment in the ruling. Their deadline is July 5.Ī decision the other way would have invalidated the groups' statewide efforts so far, forcing them to go back to the drawing board and collect new signatures, and twice as many.īut in its majority opinion, the court found that the proposed amendment's call to protect an individual's right to make their own decisions about a continuum of reproductive care issues - contraception, fertility treatment, continuing one's own pregnancy, miscarriage care and abortion - met the standard of applying to the “same general purpose.” Justices disagreed, freeing Ohio Physicians for Reproductive Rights and Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom to continue to gather signatures aimed at making the November ballot. In a unanimous ruling Thursday, the Ohio Supreme Court sided with the bipartisan Ohio Ballot Board over Cincinnati Right to Life which, on behalf of a pair of anti-abortion voters, had argued that abortion should be considered as its own, separate question. COLUMBUS, Ohio - In a blow to abortion opponents in Ohio, a fall ballot issue aimed at enshrining access to the procedure in state's constitution will not be split into two separate issues - one about abortion, and one about other reproductive healthcare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |